Prince Charles Supports the Great Reset

The prince of Wales has turned to some unsavory allies to change the world.


The heir to the British throne is warning that a United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow could be our last chance to save the planet from climate change. In an interview released on October 11, Prince Charles emphasized that Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison should attend next month’s climate event despite Australia’s covid-19 travel ban, because “[i]f we don’t really take the decisions that are vital now, it’s going to be almost impossible to catch up.”

This is not the first time Prince Charles has warned we have had our last chance. In 2014, he said a Climate Change Conference in Paris was our “last chance,” and in 2009, he said a Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen was our “last chance.” Yet global temperatures have only risen by about a degree since the Copenhagen conference, and an upcoming period of low solar activity will likely slow even this mild warming (see our articles “Greenhouse Apocalypse” and “The Deadly Climate Change Deception” for why carbon emissions do not actually cause natural disasters).

Yet none of this will stop Prince Charles’s ambitious plan to revolutionize the world economy.

Last August, Prince Charles wrote an editorial for the Daily Mail declaring that the climate change crisis can only be solved by businesses and governments working together. He wants businesses to sign a charter called the Terra Carta, which commits them to put “sustainability” at the heart of their activities. When this charter talks about “sustainability,” however, it means meeting the carbon reduction targets set by the Paris Climate Accords. Meeting these reduction targets would weaken the manufacturing sectors of the United States and Britain while empowering multinational corporations that manufacture goods in countries where environmental regulations are less stringent. (Please read “What the Paris Climate Agreement Was Really About,” by Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry, for information about the threat the Paris Climate Accords poses to the U.S. and UK.)

More than 400 companies have already signed the Terra Carta, and Prince Charles hopes to use the Glasgow summit to convince even more companies to do so. Along with Pope Francis and World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles has launched a project called the “Great Reset” in the wake of the covid-19 pandemic. Instead of free markets, this globalist project says the world should implement wealth taxes, government regulations and massive infrastructure spending programs in its quest to “Build Back Better” after the pandemic and halt climate change.

“The prince believes that as countries and businesses around the world look to rebuild after this crisis, there is a unique but narrow window of opportunity to accelerate the sustainability agenda in a way that puts people and planet first,” said a Sustainable Markets Initiative spokesman in an interview with the Telegraph. “Before industries simply return to the old ways of doing things, this group, led by the prince and Professor Schwab, is setting out to show we have a chance to recover by doing things differently and with a lot less negative impact on the world we live in.”

Comments like this one have caused the editors at Vanity Fair to ask: “Is Prince Charles Using the Pandemic to Take on Capitalism?” The answer to their question is a resounding “Yes.” Coronavirus lockdowns reduced carbon emissions by 2.8 billion tons in 2020. A Nature journal piece notes how these lockdowns mentally prepared people for the “personal carbon allowances” necessary to meet the carbon reduction targets set by the Paris Climate Accords.

Now the World Economic Forum is seeking guidance from the Catholic Church on how to use Catholic social doctrine to undermine free markets. This is alarming. Prince Charles is heir to the throne of the nation primarily responsible for spreading free markets around the world, yet he has chosen to team up with the pope and a German engineer to destroy those markets.

On Dec. 8, 2020, Pope Francis established what he calls the Council for Inclusive Capitalism With the Vatican. Led by the pope and Cardinal Peter Turkson, it includes numerous leaders from Fortune 500 companies with 200 million employees in 163 countries and $2.1 trillion in market capitalization—more money than the gross domestic product of Italy. It is led by a core group of 27 leaders it calls the Guardians for Inclusive Capitalism, which include the chairmen and chief executives of Allianz, Bank of America, BP, Dupont, Johnson & Johnson, Mastercard, Merck and Visa.

Many have said this real-life organization seems like something out of a conspiracy theory forum, but its goals are aligned with Professor Schwab’s World Economic Forum and Prince Charles’s Sustainable Markets Initiative. They want to use something akin to Catholic social doctrine to establish a “third way” between capitalism and communism.

Like Pope Francis and Klaus Schwab, Prince Charles is espousing a philosophy sometimes called state capitalism but which used to be called corporatism. While pure socialism is direct government control of resources (and people), corporatism permits people to engage in private enterprise but manages them heavily through corporations. These corporations group people together according to their interests and social functions so they can regulate behavior.

Before the Second World War, fascist dictators like Francisco Franco of Spain, Benito Mussolini of Italy and Adolf Hitler of Germany ran openly corporatist economies with the blessing of the pope. And after World War ii, Latin American Catholic dictators like Juan Perón of Argentina and Augusto Pinochet of Chile did the same thing. Now global elites want to use covid-19 and the threat of climate change to restore this tyrannical system.

In his book The Coming of Neo-Feudalism: A Warning to the Global Middle Class, Joel Kotkin, a fellow of urban studies at Chapman University, warns that the government’s alliance with big business will result in the formation of a “cognitively superior ruling class” that will govern the world like a feudal aristocracy, treating people like serfs who are too stupid to be allowed opinions. But even he does not realize the extent to which corporate feudalism will make a comeback.

Revelation 17 reveals that a powerful religious entity will become a guiding force over a great economic powerhouse that intoxicates all nations with its wealth and splendor. Revelation 18:3 says that “the merchants of the earth have become rich through the abundance of her luxury” (New King James Version). These verses are talking about the merger of state, corporate and religious power. We see this merger today, and the prince of Wales is helping it happen.

„Se va încumeta să schimbe și … vremea!“

Să fie asta una din interpretările textului din cartea profetului Daniel?

China va produce ninsoare și ploaie artificială pe jumătate din teritoriu. Cum funcționează „însămânțarea norilor”

06.12.2020 15:37

Ploaie artificială câmp
Foto: Getty Images

China anunță că își va dezvolta proiectul de control meteorologic și că are ca obiectiv capacitatea de a putea declanșa ninsoare și ploaie artificială pe jumătate din teritoriul rău, conform Business Insider.

Autoritățile chineze spun că proiectul de „însămânțare a norilor” va crește de cinci ori și va acoperi un teritoriu de peste 5,4 milioane de kilometri pătrați, ceea ce reprezintă 56% din suprafața totală a țării.

Chinezii spun că proiectul va ajuta la atenuarea dezastrelor naturale precum grindina, seceta sau incendiile de pădure.

China a mai folosit această tehnică în 2008, înainte de Jocurile Olimpice pe care le-a găzduit în acel an, susținând că ploile prevăzute de meteorologi în acele zile au fost „declanșate” înainte. În iunie 2016, țara a alocat de 30 de milioane de dolari pentru finanțarea acestui proiect.

Generarea ploii sau ninsorii artificiale reprezintă un principiu meteorologic simplu – aducerea chimicalelor precum iodură de argint sau nitrogen lichid în atmosferă forțează norii să condenseze picăturile de apă care cad, apoi, în funcție de temperatură, sub formă de ploaie sau ninsoare.

Modalitatea chinezilor este de a lansa proiectile încărcate cu aceste minerale înspre cer. În jur de 168 de milioane de dolari au mai fost cheltuite și în 2017 pentru achiziționarea a patru aeronave și „897 de lansatoare de rachete”.

Practica de „însămânțare a norilor” a fost descoperită în Statele Unite în 1946 de un chimist care lucra pentru compania General Electric. China a lansat un program similar în anii 1960.

Editor : Adrian Dumitru

America este reținută, Singapore n-are rețineri morale sau drepturi individuale

Singapore a luat fața SUA – Este prima țară din lume care introduce verificarea facială în sistemul oficial

Autor: Remus Vlad, RedactorPublicat: 26/09/2020 17:26

recunoastere faciala

Singapore este prima țară din lume care folosește verificarea facială în sistemul național de evidență a populației, pentru a oferi acces atât la serviciile private, cât și la cele guvernamentale, relatează BBC.

Agenția guvernamentală pentru tehnologie spune că va fi „fundamentală” pentru economia digitală a țării.

Sistemul a fost testat într-o bancă și este acum lansat la nivel național. Tehnologia nu numai că identifică o persoană, dar se și asigură că aceasta este cu adevărat prezentă.

“Trebuie să vă asigurați că persoana este cu adevărat prezentă atunci când se autentifică, că nu este o fotografie, un videoclip, o înregistrare reluată sau un deepfake”, a declarat Andrew Bud, fondator și director executiv al iProov, compania din Marea Britanie care furnizează tehnologia.

Tehnologia va fi integrată cu schema de identitate digitală SingPass și permite accesul la serviciile guvernamentale.

“Este pentru prima dată când verificarea feței bazată pe cloud este utilizată pentru a asigura identitatea persoanelor care utilizează un sistem național de identitate digitală”, a spus Bud.

Atât recunoașterea facială, cât și verificarea facială depind de scanarea feței unui subiect și de potrivirea acesteia cu o imagine dintr-o bază de date existentă, pentru a-i stabili identitatea.

Verificarea necesită consimțământul explicit al utilizatorului, iar utilizatorul primește ceva în schimb, cum ar fi accesul la telefon său sau la aplicația bancară.

Prin contrast, tehnologia de recunoaștere a feței ar putea scana fața tuturor celor dintr-o gară și ar avertiza autoritățile dacă un criminal trece prin fața camerei.

Multe guverne folosesc deja verificarea facială, dar puține au luat în considerare atașarea tehnologiei la identitatea națională.

În unele cazuri, acest lucru este urmarea faptului că nu există un act de identitate național. În SUA, de exemplu, majoritatea oamenilor folosesc permisele de conducere eliberate de stat ca principală formă de identificare.

China nu a încercat să asocieze verificarea facială cu sistemul de evidență a populației, dar anul trecut a adoptat reguli care îi obligă pe clienți să-și scaneze fețele atunci când cumpără un nou telefon mobil, astfel încât să poată fi verificați.

Verificarea facială este deja răspândită în aeroporturi și multe departamente guvernamentale o folosesc, inclusiv Ministerul de Interne al Regatului Unit și Serviciul Național de Sănătate și Departamentul de Securitate Internă al SUA.

Fiara europeană își ascute colții

Germania pune piciorul în prag: Ţările cu datorii îşi vor pierde suveranitatea

Germania pune piciorul în prag: Ţările cu datorii îşi vor pierde suveranitatea

Autor: Iulian Anghel

28.07.2011, 12:40 21469

Într-o ieşire aspră, ministrul german al finanţelor WolfgangSchäuble a susţinut sancţionarea ţărilor “problemă” din uniuneamonetară, nu cu excluderea lor, ci cu pierderea suveranităţii înfavoarea UE.

Într-un interviu acordată săptămânalului Stern şi comentat deDeutsche Welle şi RFI, şeful finanţelor germane susţine: “O ţară cuprobleme care trebuie ajutată ar trebui să cedeze Uniunii Europene,la schimb, o parte din drepturile sale de suveranitate”. Măsura arfi mai bună şi mai funcţională decât excluderea unor state din zonaeuro, spune ministrul. “Europa nu are cum să reuşească dacă nu sestabileşte clar că un stat membru nu poate fi dat afară din zonaeuro”.

Într-un interviu pentru ZF, ministrul român de externe TeodorBaconschi a susţinut că retragerea unui stat din zona euro ar creadificultăţi majore întregului spaţiu european, de aceea salvareaeurozonei trebuie să fie obiectivul numărul unu al Uniunii.

Deutsche Welle aminteşte că Wolfgang Schäuble a pledat, într-oscrisoare adresată parlamentarilor conservatori, în favoareadeciziilor luate la ultimul summit special al ţărilor zonei europentru salvarea Greciei.

El a admis că planul de salvare a Greciei nu este lipsit deriscuri, susţinând însă că alte variante posibile erau şi mairiscante.

În interviul citat,Schäuble pledează pentrublocarea dreptului la vot al statelor care nu respectă pactul destabilitate şi creştere, o propunere care fusese avansată anultrecut şi de cancelarul Angela Merkel. De altfel, Grecia aexperimentat pe propria-i piele o situaţie asemănătoare. Practic,când a fost lansat primul plan de salvare a Greciei de 110 mld.euro, în vreme ce membrii eurozonei analizau situaţia,reprezentanţii acestei ţări au aşteptat la uşă sfârşituldiscuţiilor fără să fie primiţi înăuntru.

Schäuble pledează pentru adâncirea integrării UE, dar cu regulimult mai dure. “Integrarea trebuie să continue, iar unui stat careare probleme i se va acorda ajutor, dar: “va trebui să renunţe la oparte a suveranităţii sale naţionale în favoarea Uniunii Europene “Această măsură este mai eficientă decât dacă anumite ţări cudatorii, membre ale UE, vor fi eliminate din zona euro, explicăminstrul german de finanţe.



Exclusive: Patrice Lewis ID’s left’s goal as ‘a single unified progressive groupthink society’

The world has been watching China’s social credit system with grim fascination, a real-life compulsory Orwellian horror in which citizens’ lives are determined by their social score. Daily activities are monitored and tracked, then distilled into a single number according to rules set by the government. Intended to be fully implanted by 2020, its goal is to “standardize the assessment of citizens’ and businesses’ economic and social reputation.”

Standardize. That word alone should send shivers down your spine. Let the meaning sink in: standardize. That means conformity is enshrined and individuality and innovation are attacked.

When criticized about its draconian social order, “Chinese Communist Party publications scoff that Westerners are simply too unsophisticated to understand the wonders of the new system,” according to the New York Post. Translation: If you criticize the government, ipso facto you’re dangerous. Communist Russia used this argument to incarcerate dissidents in psych wards, where they were experimented upon. China is already “reconditioning” high-profile individuals to behave only in accordance with communist principles, such as popular Chinese movie star Fan Bingbing.

This is all very interesting in a distant and other-side-of-the-world sort of way, right? Or … are we facing something similar here in America?

Think about it. The U.S. is in the grip of a progressive mobocracy trying to standardize everyone’s thoughts and actions. Leftists insist you support their side or they will find some way to hurt you – economically, politically, socially, educationally, or in your career.

Little by little, incrementally, the progressive dominance of politics, schools and the media means conservative thought is being suppressed (at best) or punished (at worst). Don’t believe me? Just consider the number of people afraid to admit their support for Trump lest they have their grades penalized or their job jeopardized or their cars keyed. If you’re caught wearing a MAGA hat in public, you’re practically taking your life in your hands.

Conservatives are heckled in the streets, harassed in restaurants and have their homes or businesses sabotaged. In school, children are bullied or expelled for expressing Christian opinions or objecting to “transgender” athletes dominating girls’ sports.

In an unregulated (and some might argue, unhinged) invasion into our privacy, the Google/Facebook/YouTube/Amazon/Microsoft/Apple cabal is listening and tracking everything: what we say, what we research, where we travel, what routes we take, what we buy and everything else about us. China does the same thing.

Leftists can “jokingly” put up Facebook posts or tweet about assassinating the president, killing cops, organizing harassment campaigns and other mayhem, but the social media giants turns a blind eye and instead disable accounts of conservatives on a whim.

The extreme left-wing and weirdly influential Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has designated so many conservative individuals and organizations as “hate groups” that some are suing the organization for “racketeering.”

Conservatives are being damaged economically. Thanks to the SPLC’s influence, PayPal is banning some groups from receiving online donations using their platform. Mastercard is calling for a vote at its upcoming June shareholder meeting to financially blacklist conservatives. The same activist group pushing Mastercard, SumOfUs, “is fighting against people and groups it deems hateful such by trying to get them financially blacklisted on social media and payment platforms such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, Patreon and PayPal. Their goal is to ‘choke off donations.’”

Some social media sites are even changing their own rules to justify banning free speech by conservatives. Not to be left out of the game, the federal government is trying to create legislation like the “Equality” Act, which promises to make Christianity (upon which this nation was founded, remember?) all but illegal in practice.

See? Incrementally, step by step, progressives are attempting to turn America into a dystopian state every bit as oppressive as China. One conservative noted, “Democrats want this country to be a place where the witch hunters call you guilty and force you to prove your innocence before the screaming mob.” The goal is a single unified progressive groupthink society.

But of course the one single thing keeping America from turning into China is the Second Amendment. Eliminating personal firearms ownership is possibly the biggest goal of the left. But progressives have discovered one important tactic on the road to banning guns: Don’t make it illegal, just make it impossible.

To this end, big banks are being pressured to stop lending to gun manufacturersSenate Bill S2857A in New York would force every gun owner in the state (who isn’t law enforcement or active military) to purchase and maintain a minimum $1 million liability insurance policy. Another bill was introduced that would require anyone who wants to buy a gun to turn over their internet search history and their social media passwords to determine “who is not suitable to hold and possess a firearm.”

In other words, unchecked, the progressive promises of utopia here in the U.S. bear an eerie similarity to what China is implementing now, in which people are being “standardized” in accordance to the progressive economic and social requirements.

The Chinese government claims this system is “restoring morality” to its nation. So let’s talk morality.

Jesse Lee Peterson wisely observed, “Democrats are about control, but they cannot control a moral people. Democrats have to make people angry and immoral in order to assume power over them.”

In a poignant video (below) by Harvard professor Clay Christensen, he relates a conversation with a Marxist economist from China finishing up a Fulbright Fellowship. The Chinese economist was stunned to learn “how critical religion is to the functioning of democracy.”

“The reason why democracy works,” said the Chinese economist, “is not because the government was designed to oversee what everybody does. But rather democracy works because most people, most of the time, voluntarily choose to obey the law. … Americans followed these rules because they had come to believe that they weren’t just accountable to society, they were accountable to God. … If you take away religion, you cannot hire enough police.

China came up with its answer to “not enough police” by implementing this social credit system. Take away Americans’ guns and faith, and this will be the next step here as well.