Praful inteligent – micro tehnologie pentru macro controlul populației

Smart Dust – The Future Of Involuntary Treatment Of The Public

smart dust

By Pedro Aquila

Smart dust is a name given to extremely small computing particles, RFID chips, or other very small technologies.

A popular article from Extreme Tech describes it in the headline: “Smart dust: A complete computer that’s smaller than a grain of sand.” An article from War is Boring is titled “Future Military Sensors Could Be Tiny Specks of ‘Smart Dust’ New technologies allow for extremely small—and ubiquitous—military sensors.” A paper from University of California, San Diego describes smart dust:

“The term “smart dust” originally referred to miniature wireless semiconductor devices made using fabrication techniques derived from the microelectronics industry. These devices incorporate sensing, computing and communications in a centimetre-sized package.”

It is promoted as an eventuality, that smart dust will cover streets and buildings to identify people, that people will have smart dust in their bodies, and other things in mainstream television and media. They paint a utopian, blissful picture of it.

However, the history of entities involved in creating smart dust show a different perspective. The same entities who create destructive technology (drones, surveillance technology, technology for warfare) are involved with its creation: military industrial complex players, from the RAND Corporation to Hitachi, to DARPAand their collaborators in academia.

As with all technology, the people who wield it determine whether it’s used for the benefit of, or against the common people.

The earliest mentions of “smart dust” come from the RAND CorporationAccording to Wikipedia:

“The concepts for Smart Dust emerged from a workshop at RAND in 1992 and a series of DARPA ISAT studies in the mid-1990s due to the potential military applications of the technology.  The work was strongly influenced by work at UCLA and the University of Michigan during that period.”

The Rand Corporation has been involved in morally reprehensible warfare, think tank activity and strategy in particular, for several decades. They were involved in nuclear war strategy, disrespecting the lives of everyone on the planet in scenarios where nuclear bombs would be detonated to retaliate against Russia at the expense of all life on Earth.

Such apocalyptic scenarios are explored in many RAND publications, and in 2016, they examined possibilities of war with China. RAND has published several papers about spraying the skies, involuntarily treating whole populations with chemicals to geoengineer the weather. One is titled “Governing Geoengineering Research: A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-Term Options.”

With the recent announcement that the US government is looking into geoengineering research, it looks like an overt, involuntary treatment of the American people with geoengineering material is coming soon. They act as if they aren’t already spraying us.

RAND is likely to be involved with complex science used for control over populations, as implied in a publication of theirs. It reads,

“Beyond the agricultural and industrial revolutions of the past, a global technology revolution is currently changing the world. This book discusses the broad, multidisciplinary, and synergistic trends in this revolution, including genomics, cloning, biomedical engineering, smart materials, agile manufacturing, nanofabricated computation devices, and integrated microsystems.”

A central, historical player in Japan’s military industrial complex, Hitachi developed some of the smallest smart dust particles ever disclosed to the public, a full 15 years ago with the announcement of the 0.4mm x 0.4mm external antenna µ-Chip. As far back as 2001, “smart dust” was this small. It is depicted in this popular meme still circulating on social media.

Considering how far back the technology goes, how small is the smallest “smart dust” today? Could it be small enough to perform functions inside the human body, or be involuntarily sprayed on us without us realizing it? 

Considering what we don’t know about the inner workings of DARPA, the institutes of technology so influential to modern warfare, and other historically dangerous institutions, what technology similar to smart dust could they be Continue reading


Israel’s Sanhedrin reinstates assessment for daily operations

BOB UNRUH About | Email Archive

After 2,000 years, the Temple tax is returning for all Jews. Worldwide.

Israel’s Sanhedrin, the ancient high court that recently was reborn, has announced not only the resumption of the half-shekel per person per year tax, but procedures so that that Jews around the globe can participate.

It’s based on God’s instructions in Exodus that everyone 20 years and older “shall give the contribution to the Lord. The rich shall not pay more and the poor shall not pay less than the half shekel.”

According to a Breaking Israel Israel report, while the Temple was Continue reading

Papa este țapul care se vrea neapărat în Ierusalim !

Cetatea sfântă este împărțită astăzi în trei ,,cartiere“: cel arab, cel evreu și cel creștin.

În mod normal, Biserica nu este legată în nici un fel de Ierusalimul pământesc, pentru că ea există pentru Ierusalimul ceresc, în care are deja cetățenie. ,,Cruciadele“ (militare sau politice) sunt o obsesie vinovată a Bisericii Catolice.

Papa ține neapărat să-și asume autoritatea asupra ,,locurilor sfinte“. Catolicismul s-a pretins mereu înlocuitorul de drept al Israelului istoric. Este o vinovăție pentru care va fi judecat de Domnul.

Iată încă un episod din ,,atacurile romane“ pentru Ierusalim. Catolicii sunt gata oricând să calce în picioare poporul evreu ca să aibă ascendent asupra locurilor de acolo alături, dacă nu împreună, cu ,,arabii“, alți uzurpatori ai Țării Sfinte.



Pope Francis receives Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Oct. 17, 2013, in Vatican City. (Vatican Pool/Getty Images)

Pope Francis receives Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Oct. 17, 2013, in Vatican City.
(Vatican Pool/Getty Images)

Why Does the Pope Keep Meeting With Mahmoud Abbas?

January 12, 2017  •  From
The Vatican is again inserting itself into the peace process—but for what purpose?

JERUSALEM—Pope Francis will meet with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Rome on Saturday, the Vatican confirmed on Tuesday. It will be the fifth personal meeting between the two since 2013, a clear indication of the pope’s dedication to the Palestinian cause.

However, the timing of the meeting, at least from Israel’s standpoint, couldn’t be worse.

Israel is still reeling from the December 23 United Nations Security Council resolution, which declared any Israeli construction in the area that Jordan controlled before the 1967 Six-Day War to be illegal and a “flagrant violation of international law.” The resolution passed because the United States refused to use its veto against the measure as it had done to similar resolutions in the past. In general, Israelis view the move as a stab in the back by President Barack Obama, after eight years of deteriorating relations during his presidency.

Now, as Israel scrambles to remove the knife from its back, the Vatican is ready to pour salt in the wound.

By meeting with Abbas on the eve of the Paris Peace Conference, where the international Israel-bashing is set to continue, Pope Francis is inserting himself into a politically charged situation, tipping the balance even further in the Palestinian direction. The timely meeting is tantamount to papal endorsement of the UNSCresolution against Israel, as well as a blatant testimonial of the “righteousness” of the Palestinian cause.

While we cannot be sure about the subject matter of the forthcoming conversation between Abbas and the pope, recent history shows that it won’t serve Israel’s interest.

Coming to Israel

The second meeting between Francis and Abbas took place during the pope’s landmark visit to Israel in 2014. The visit itself was a response to Abbas’s invitation a year earlier, when they met the first time. Perhaps you recall the pope choosing to do a photo op at a portion of the Israeli security barrier. “In between scheduled engagements,” Trumpet editor in chief Gerald Flurry wrote in the August 2014 Trumpet issue, “the pope ordered his motorcade to Continue reading

Profetic, este normal ca ONU să se mute în Europa, de preferință la Roma

130402unitednationslogoThe clash between the United States and the increasingly anti-Israel United Nations is heating up.

Sarah Palin joined the chorus of voices calling for a #USexit, saying the United Nations works against American interests, and the U.S. should “get the heck out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S.”

An increasing number of conservative media figures are also condemning the recent resolution against Israel as the last straw, with Josh Hammer at The Resurgent declaring, “Destroy the United Nations.”

But the case against the United Nations is also being made on religious, not just political, grounds.

Furious at the international body’s hostility against the Jewish state of Israel, several Christian leaders told WND the time has come for the U.S. and the incoming Trump administration to take strong action against the globalist body.

“I believe it is past time for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations,” pastor Carl Gallups told WND.

Gallups, a strong Trump supporter during the campaign and the author of several books, including his latest, “When The Lion Roars,” said the United Nations has outlived its usefulness.

“One rule shared by most successful people and nations is to never eternally invest in a concept, organization or philosophy to the extent that when that entity is drastically changed, or has become obsolete or corrupt, that you cannot pull out it. In 1945, the United Nations was established with the main goal of maintaining international peace and security. What could go wrong with an idea like that? Well, here we are, and not only has the U.N. concept gone wrong, but it has, in the opinion of many, become corrupt to the very core.”

Gallups accused the U.N. of furthering the causes of violence, terrorism and extremism it was originally designed to combat.

“The United Nations has become nothing more than a breeding ground for the globalist and radical Islamic agendas,” he said. “It promotes wildly anti-Israel propaganda, furthers schemes that imperil American sovereignty and foments anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism. What’s worse, there are good reasons to believe the United Nations is a globalist, anti-Christian organization that could play a dire role during the last days. Let us disassociate ourselves from that godless mess now.”

Enough is enough! Do your part to get the cartel of globalists, terrorism appeasers and Israel haters off our soil. Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and the U.N. out of the U.S. Sign the petition here! Make your voice heard! Stand up for American independence and the security of our allies! 

Mark Biltz, pastor of El Shaddai Ministries, is a passionate supporter of the Jewish state and frequently teaches on the Jewish roots of the Christian faith and their continuing importance to believers in books such as “God’s Day Timer: The Believer’s Guide To Divine Appointments.” He says the U.N. poses a dire threat to Israel.

“It is my opinion that the United States and Israel should withdraw all funding from the United Nations, just for starters,” he told WND. “The next step, if they do not overturn the resolution, would be to expel the organization from the Continue reading

Vești de războaie

ALERTĂ Marea Britanie trimite avioane Eurofighter Typhoon în România


Britain sends hundreds of soldiers, tanks to Russian border…

Biggest military deployment since Cold War…

Moscow tests hypersonic warhead…


Parte de fier și parte de lut …

Eşecul UE de la Bratislava, frustrările lui Renzi şi calea aleasă de România


Puncte cheie:

  • Summitul informal de la Bratislava, anunţat cu surle şi trâmbiţe ca „marele moment al relansării Proiectului European după Brexit”, a fost în mod evident un eşec. Nu s-a stabilit nimic concret, nu s-a întrunit spiritul de consens puternic pe care mizau organizatorii încă din vară, nu a rezultat imaginea de voinţă politică, unitate şi determinare a liderilor europeni, menită să ridice tonusul cetăţenilor pe fondul crizei prelungite a Uniunii, în fine, nu s-au conturat, decât foarte vag şi mai degrabă cu aer de principii, soluţii la problemele cunoscute;
  • Colac peste pupăză, după ce că lucrurile merg tot mai greu, premierul italian Matteo Renzi suferă zgomotos că nu este acceptat la masa întâistătătorilor Uniunii, ca egal al lui Merkel şi Hollande, şi nu este invitat să participe la conferinţa de presă finală[1] (dacă ar suferi în tăcere ar fi o problemă strict privată), criticând ulterior summitul pe motive de „inutilitate” şi de neabordare frontală a chestiunilor esenţiale. Fostul primar al Florenţei a folosit momentul creat pentru a alimenta copios presa din peninsulă[2] cu un nou episod al campaniei sale de imagine personală, înaintea referendumului din noiembrie privind reforma constituţională din Italia, în care Renzi şi-a angajat practic mandatul de prim ministru;
  • Despre ambiţiile politice ale tânărului premier italian (41 de ani) se ştie şi se vorbeşte de multă vreme, existând chiar presupunerea că acesta ar viza poziţia de preşedinte al Comisiei Europene sau de preşedinte al Consiliului European, ceea ce desigur nu este, în sine, un lucru condamnabil, atâta timp cât aspiraţiile sale de mărire nu vin să tensioneze inutil atmosfera în cadrul Uniunii, cu atât mai mult cu cât situaţia datoriilor enorme ale Italiei (133% din PIB[3]) şi stagnarea economică[4] de anul acesta îngrijorează pe toată lumea;
  • După trilaterala din august, de pe insula Ventotene, când Renzi a avut ocazia să facă declaraţii comune cu Merkel şi Hollande despre relansarea Uniunii Europene, se crease oarecum impresia că Italia va fi acceptată de Germania şi Franţa la masa mai marilor Uniunii, ceea ce s-a dovedit repede a fi o iluzie a lui Renzi. Germania nu acceptă ca partener egal de discuţii decât Franţa (dar, şi în acest caz, cu condiţia ca rezultatul final al discuţiei să corespundă cu poziţia şi interesele strategice ale Germaniei), iar ceea ce îi este îngăduit Franţei ani la rând nu-i este îngăduit şi Italiei (de exemplu, un deficit bugetar de peste 3%), Berlinul păstrând astfel, la pupitrul UE, diferenţa de nivel politic şi economic între cele două ţări mediteraneene vorbitoare de limbi romanice;
  • Nici veleitarul Grup de la Vişegrad nu şi-a văzut profilul politic prea bine conturat, premierul ungar Orbán, care declarase înainte de summit că Grupul V4 „va prezenta propria viziune şi propriul document” în cadrul întâlnirii, ieşind nemulţumit de la discuţii şi reiterând că referendumul din Ungaria, de pe 2 octombrie, va arăta „adevărul despre ce cred oamenii” cu privire la politica de deschidere faţă de imigraţie a Uniunii Europene. Punctual, adică pe chestiunea imigraţiei, trebuie totuşi spus că este foarte posibil ca majoritatea populaţiei să fie de acord cu Orbán, mai precis cu refuzul acceptării cotelor obligatorii de refugiaţi din Orientul Mijlociu şi Nordul Africii, ceea ce nu rezolvă însă problema de fond, cu cei deja intraţi pe teritoriul Uniunii;
  • România pare să fi ales în cele din urmă calea de apropiere de nucleul Uniunii Europene (Germania, Franţa, Benelux), după o perioadă de relative ezitări, în care părea la un moment dat să cocheteze cu ideea apropierii de Grupul de la Vişegrad (la invitaţia Poloniei), grup despre care am spus în ultimul an, de mai multe ori, că a devenit, din formatul mult lăudat al premianţilor postcomunişti ai anilor ’90, „focarul naţionaliştilor şi euroscepticilor” din Uniune, de dreapta sau de stânga, cel puţin până la schimbarea conducerilor din aceste ţări. Din cele patru state central-europene ale V4, doar cu Polonia ar trebui să dezvolte România un parteneriat strategic, cu precădere pe dimensiunea de securitate, însă pe linie bilaterală, nu prin integrarea, cel puţin în actualul context, în Grupul de la Vişegrad;
  • România a ales strategic corect, preferând să gestioneze marile teme actuale ale Uniunii (migraţia, Spaţiul Schengen, negocierea Brexitului etc.) alături de puterile care formează nucleul organizaţiei, în special alături de Germania. Această opţiune nu aduce automat garanţii de succes, dar, în eventualitatea în care lucrurile vor merge din ce în ce mai rău, este preferabil să fii în cele mai bune relaţii posibile cu cei care au resursele şi capacitatea de a refonda Uniunea Europeană, de a reformula regulile, de a proiecta noi aranjamente politice, economice şi instituţionale la nivel european. Dacă tot nu trăim într-o lume ideală, iar liderii europeni nu sunt perfecţi şi nu sunt solidari, să spunem simplu că am ajuns şi noi la concluzia că, în ceea ce priveşte perspectivele Europei, e mai sigur alături de Angela Merkel decât de Viktor Orbán.

Continue reading